Every year, two Hall of Famers are born.
OK, it’s not quite that precise, but as an average, it works out: 20 future baseball Hall of Famers (from the Negro Leagues and the American and National Leagues) were born in the 1910s, and so on from there:
1920s: 17 Hall of Famers born
Average: 19.8 per decade
Two per year creates a nice symbolic standard, doesn’t it? To the question “What’s a Hall of Famer?” we can come up with any number of esoteric definitions. But “one of the two best baseball players born that year” really gets to the heart of it — especially when it splits, as it so often does, into one pitcher and one batter, the yolk and albumen in baseball’s egg:
1920s: 10 hitters, 7 pitchers
1930s: 17 hitters, 7 pitchers
1940s: 10 hitters, 8 pitchers
1950s: 15 hitters, 6 pitchers
1960s: 12 hitters, 7 pitchers
I bring this up because this year, Tim Hudson and Mark Buehrle will be on the Hall of Fame ballot for the first time. Neither will be inducted in 2021 — or, probably, ever — but voters should really consider each of them. As it stands now, and as it threatens to stand for a very long time, there are only two Hall of Fame pitchers who were born in the 1970s. It’s a very conspicuous drought, and it probably tells us a lot more about an era of baseball than it tells us about the actual talent of baseball pitching that 1970s date nights produced.
But more than Hudson or Buehrle, they should definitely check the box next to Andy Pettitte. That’s what this is really about: Everybody should vote for Andy Pettitte.
To be clear: There’s a good case for Pettitte that doesn’t involve the decade in which he was born. Pettitte’s WAR — 60 at Baseball-Reference, 68 at FanGraphs and 61 at Baseball Prospectus — is around the lower tier of inducted Hall of Famers and near the very top of the non-HOF tier, which makes his case the very definition of arguable. His FanGraphs WAR is higher than Tom Glavine’s or Roy Halladay’s (to compare him to contemporaries), and his Baseball-Reference WAR is about level with Juan Marichal and Don Drysdale (to compare him to his ancestors).
If his WAR gives us a reason not to discard him as a no, his postseason performance gives us the reason to elevate him to a yes. His postseason win probability added is sixth all time. Cooperstonian Jack Morris’ postseason résumé was (rightfully) a big part of his Hall of Fame case. Pettitte threw three times as many postseason innings as Morris, with a comparable ERA and three times as many wins. Pettitte’s record 19 postseason wins are undeniably the benefit of playing in an era of expanded playoffs, but it’s also a record that’ll probably never be broken, at least until the definition of the win is changed. (Nobody else has more than 15, and starters today don’t regularly pitch deep into postseason games the way Pettitte did. This year’s starters went six or more innings in 26% of postseason games, while Pettitte did so in 80% of his. He went a full seven innings 19 times. No starting pitcher did that twice this fall.)
But not all yeses are urgent enough to write about. I’d put Kenny Lofton in the Hall of Fame, but I never wrote a column about it. What gets Pettitte the full treatment goes back to the year of his birth: 1972, right smack in the middle of our conspicuous Hall of Fame pitcher drought. If you think that drought is just a coincidence, then there’s nothing to rectify. I just don’t think it’s a coincidence.
Andy Pettitte debuted in the majors in 1995. A few things were happening in 1995:
1. It was the third year of baseball’s offensive explosion. There were more runs scored in 1995 than there had been in a full season since 1938. In 1996, offense went up even higher, and it didn’t go down for a long time. For the first seven years of his career, Major League Baseball was in the longest sustained offensive boom in its history. Before Pettitte’s career, there had been one season in the previous 50 in which teams averaged more than 4.75 runs scored per game. The league topped that in each of the first eight seasons of his career.
2. Pitchers were increasingly being pushed to throw harder. When Ben Lindbergh studied thousands of scouting reports from that time, he found that leaguewide velocity rose every year from 1995 on. More important, by matching clubs’ overall assessments of pitchers to their fastball velocities, Lindbergh found evidence that velocity was increasingly prioritized by teams. Pitchers were both throwing harder than they ever had and they were being encouraged and incentivized to throw harder still.
3. Home runs were out of control. The strike-shortened 1994 season was only the second year in history in which teams hit more than one homer per game. The league did that every single year afterward, setting three new leaguewide records in Pettitte’s first six years.
4. Batters were becoming more patient — or pitchers were becoming more cautious, or higher strikeout totals were pushing counts deeper, or a combination of all three. But at-bats were lasting longer: 3.7 pitches per PA when he debuted, up from 3.58 a half-decade earlier.
So put it together: longer and more high-stress innings, comprising longer plate appearances — because every hitter in the lineup was a threat to homer — and more pitches that had to be thrown at maximum effort. And pitchers were doing this all while throwing harder than pitchers ever had before, for teams that were encouraging more velocity than they ever had before. It was a great way to get hurt.
There were, of course, great pitchers during this time: Greg Maddux (born 1966), Roger Clemens (1962) and Randy Johnson (1963) are three GOAT contenders, and they were all active in the middle of this. There were Tom Glavine (1966) and John Smoltz (1967), plus non-HOFers Curt Schilling (1966) and Kevin Brown (1965). But those pitchers were all well established by the time these trends took hold. Even Mike Mussina (born 1968) was 24, with 330 big league innings under his belt, by the time the switch flipped from “pitchers league” to “hitters league” in 1993.
My hypothesis is that it was hard to pitch in those years, but it was extremely hard to be a young pitcher. They were being asked to pitch at high effort for long innings and with men on base. They were being asked to get their feet wet against lineups full of steroid users and to maintain their confidence while getting their teeth knocked in. If you were a young pitcher, this would be the worst league to debut in. And if you were a pitcher who was a little bit more prone to injury, as young pitchers on balance are, then this would be the worst league to stay healthy in.
So compare Pettitte not to Maddux or Clemens but to the pitchers who had to do what he had to do: who had to make it out of the minors during this era, who had to debut in the mid-’90s in their early-to-mid-20s, and who had to survive their first half-dozen seasons in the middle of an offensive and velocity explosion.
If we agree that those pitchers — the ones born in 1972 or thereabouts, the ones drafted in 1990 or thereabouts, and the ones who debuted in 1995 or thereabouts — are Pettitte’s true contemporaries, he starts to look really good. Only two other pitchers born in the 1970s — Pedro Martinez and Roy Halladay — had more career WAR than he did. (And note that Halladay very nearly lost his career during this era, getting sent back to Single-A after posting the worst ERA in major league history when he was 23.)
Sixty WAR might not be all that exceptional for the generation born in the 1960s, in other words, but it’s darned near the top of the scale for a pitcher born in the 1970s.
But if the case for Pettitte is “60 WAR is really amazing for a modern pitcher,” then what do we do about the inconvenient facts of Max Scherzer, Justin Verlander, Clayton Kershaw and Zack Greinke — all born in the mid-1980s, all likely to challenge 70, 80, maybe 90 career WAR?
It’s true that many of them were also brought up with the same challenges we highlighted for the pitchers born in the 1970s: longer at-bats, more emphasis on strikeouts and velocity, relatively high offensive environment, not to mention having been raised pitching year-round in travel ball and showcases, which many consider dangerous for young arms. It’s probably true that pitching is just as hard on the young arm today as it was when Pettitte and his peers were young arms. But by the 2000s, medical care was catching up to the needs. Shoulder strengthening dramatically reduced shoulder injuries, Tommy John rehabs were more effective and so on.
You can see this in the success rates of pitching prospects throughout the 1990s and beyond. I once found that the average top-50 pitching prospect in 2008 produced about four times as many WAR, and threw about twice as many innings, as the average top pitching prospect in 1993. (These weren’t one-year flukes — the trend was pretty consistent.)
All of this is to say that it’s really hard to put Pettitte’s 61 WAR into perfect context. But it’s already a competitive number, bolstered by postseason stardom and his key role on a postseason dynasty, which make his career quite consequential. If we adjust for his birth peers, the case that he was an extraordinary outlier — as all Hall of Famers are — seems sturdy.
The case against him:
1. He did PEDs. Fair! If that’s a blanket disqualifier to you, he’s disqualified. But so far 60% of voters support Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, and nearly 30% support Manny Ramirez — who was suspended twice after the league began testing. So we know that, at the very least, 60% of voters are willing to vote for a PED user. And at least 30% are willing to vote for a PED user (even a repeat PED user) who isn’t arguably the greatest hitter or pitcher ever. Clearly, the PEDs are not primarily what kept Pettitte to about 10% in his two turns on the ballot.
2. He didn’t have the accolades of a superstar during his career: No Cy Young, only three All-Star appearances. Also fair! But his Cy Young shares are consistent with plenty of other Hall of Famers (e.g. Mike Mussina, Bert Blyleven, Don Sutton, others). His lack of All-Star appearances probably reflects a quirk of his: He was much better in the second half than he was in the first: 4.06 ERA, .589 winning percentage before the break, 3.60 ERA, .670 winning percentage after. Odd, but not in any way a factor in his value to his club. The point of a career isn’t directly to make All-Star games.
That’s pretty much it, along with the fact that there are some better pitchers who aren’t in the Hall — but, then, there are a bunch of worse ones who are. There’s a pretty good chance that nobody born after him will ever top his 256 wins, especially if he can hold off Clayton Kershaw.
At the moment, the number of Hall of Fame hitters born in the 1970s is also low, by historical standards — there are five in so far — but that’ll change in coming years. Ichiro Suzuki and David Ortiz will both likely walk in. Adrian Beltre is going to be automatic. Alex Rodriguez is too, unless voters punish him for his PED suspension and multiple PED scandals. That’d make nine, and it probably won’t stop there: Scott Rolen’s vote totals are going up exponentially, Carlos Beltran should make it, and people will write columns on behalf of Chase Utley, the NL’s second-best player for a half-decade. Three other players on the ballot — Andruw Jones, Todd Helton and Manny Ramirez — have been getting more support than Pettitte. The hitters will be fine.
But no pitcher from the decade currently gets the same support, or looks likely to without some attempt at balancing the era. If people won’t vote for Pettitte (60/68 WAR), they probably won’t vote for Mark Buehrle (60/52) or Tim Hudson (58/49). They already passed on the short but brilliant career of Johan Santana (52/46), and the slightly longer, slightly less brilliant career of Roy Oswalt (50/53). They’re not flocking to the post-Mariano Rivera relievers, Billy Wagner and Joe Nathan. That leaves … nobody. There’s nobody else.
And even the first third of the 1980s might go unrepresented, unless CC Sabathia gets in. Having read this article, you probably won’t be surprised that I think Sabathia should get in. Fortunately, I think he actually will get in. Also:
Pettitte: 60 B-Ref WAR, 68 FanGraphs WAR, 256 wins, 117 ERA+
Sabathia: 63 B-Ref WAR, 67 FanGraphs WAR, 251 wins, 116 ERA+
But look, somebody’s got to be in the Hall of Fame besides Roy Halladay and Pedro Martinez. More than 2,000 days separated Pedro’s birth and Halladay’s, and more than 2,000 days separated Halladay’s birth and Justin Verlander’s. Almost six years, a very long time. Pettitte is clearly the best pitcher the world produced in the first period, as Sabathia was clearly the best pitcher the world produced in the second. Put ’em both in.
MLB hires former Chicago Cubs president Theo Epstein as consultant to ‘on-field matters’
Former three-time World Series-winning executive Theo Epstein was hired by Major League Baseball on Thursday as a consultant to “on-field matters” as the sport contemplates rule changes to create more action and pace to the game.
“As the game evolves, we all have an interest in ensuring the changes we see on the field make the game as entertaining and action-packed as possible for the fans, while preserving all that makes baseball so special,” Epstein said in a statement. “I look forward to working with interested parties throughout the industry to help us collectively navigate toward the very best version of our game.”
Epstein stepped down as president of baseball operations for the Chicago Cubs in November after nine years with the team. On his way out, he shouldered some of the blame for the problems in the sport.
“The executives, like me, who have spent a lot of time using analytics and other measures to try to optimize individual and team performance have unwittingly had a negative impact on the aesthetic value of the game and the entertainment value of the game in some respects,” Epstein said when he resigned.
Now he’ll be on the other side of the issue, working with baseball analytics experts to determine the effects of potential rule changes to help the sport overall. Epstein won two World Series titles with the Boston Red Sox, in 2004 and 2007, before doing the same with the Cubs in 2016. He’ll be under the supervision of the commissioner and the owners’ competition committee.
“Theo is one of the most accomplished and thoughtful people in our sport,” commissioner Rob Manfred said via statement. “I am grateful that he has accepted our invitation to complement our ongoing efforts and provide his insights on making the best game in the world even better for the next generation of fans.”
2021 Baseball Hall of Fame
The MLB Hall of Fame Class of 2021 is set to be announced on Jan. 26. But the big question is whether anyone will get in. Curt Schilling, Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds are all in their ninth year on the ballot and each got over 60 percent of the vote last year, but will any of them reach 75 percent? Schilling was the closest last year, getting 70 percent of the vote, while Clemens (61 percent) and Bonds (60.7 percent) were just over 60 percent.
Beyond those three, returning players like Scott Rolen, Todd Helton, Billy Wagner, Gary Sheffield and Omar Vizquel will look to move closer to a spot in Cooperstown.
What about newcomers to the ballot in 2021? No first-time players will be inducted, but it will be interesting to see whether any of them get enough support to create momentum for upcoming years.
Any new inductees will join Derek Jeter and Larry Walker at this summer’s enshrinement since the 2020 class wasn’t inducted this past July due to COVID-19.
2020 Hall of Fame
• Complete coverage of 2020 Hall of Fame class
• Jeter, Walker elected to the Hall of Fame
• Doolittle: Where Jeter really ranks among greatest shortstops
• Schoenfield: Winners and losers of 2020 Hall of Fame voting announcement
• 2020 Baseball Hall of Fame: Whom did our voters pick?
• Schoenfield: Predicting Hall of Fame selections through the 2020s
• Doolittle: Ranking every baseball Hall of Famer
• Marvin Miller and Ted Simmons elected to Hall of Fame
• Doolittle: Miller and Simmons finally get their due
2019 Hall of Fame
• Complete coverage of 2019 Hall of Fame class
• What makes each member of 2019 HOF class a Hall of Famer
• A-Rod: Mo wasn’t afraid to chew out ‘somebody who needed it — like me’
• Passan: Why Bonds and Clemens aren’t getting into the Hall of Fame
Mickey Mantle baseball card shatters all-time record, sells for $5.2 million
A Mickey Mantle baseball card has shattered a five-month-old record for highest-selling sports card of all time, going for $5.2 million, PWCC Marketplace announced on Thursday.
The 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 9 — PSA is a grading system that ranges from 1-10 — took the record from a one-of-one Mike Trout rookie that sold for $3.94 million in August. It’s believed that there are only six PSA 9s of that Mantle card still in existence.
Rob Gough, the actor who acquired streetwear brand Dope in 2017, purchased the ’52 Mantle, which former NFL lineman Evan Mathis sold in 2018 for $2.88 million.
“The 1952 Topps Mantle is the holy grail of sports cards,” Gough said. “As a kid ripping packs in the ’90s, I always dreamt of owning one. … I felt this Mantle was highly underpriced.”
While not Mantle rookies, the 1952 cards are renowned for being Topps’ first annual set and for having been dumped, by the thousands, into the Hudson River in 1960 after overproduction.
Since August, Gough has amassed a 1916 Sporting News Babe Ruth rookie, a 1917 Collins-McCarthy Joe Jackson and several PSA 10 Michael Jordan rookie cards among others.
The purchase marks yet another milestone amid a recent surge in big-money sports memorabilia sales. Eight cards have now sold for $900,000 or more, with six of those sales in the past 12 months. Before the Trout rookie sale in August, a T206 Honus Wagner PSA 5, sold in 2016, held the record at $3.12 million.
And the ceiling could rise further yet. There are three recognized PSA 10 (rated “gem mint” condition, a “virtually perfect card” according to PSA) Mantles in existence, one of which was on climate-controlled, UV-protected display, and transported by armored car, in Colorado in 2018. They’re valued at more than $10 million each.
Premier League injuries: Every Man Utd, Liverpool and Arsenal absentee as 91 players out
Eric Gordon says James Harden trade allows Houston Rockets to ‘move forward’
Liverpool boss Klopp told he has "fried" Alexander-Arnold in brutal Salah comparison
Colts GM Chris Ballard — Philip Rivers has said he’s ‘not 100% sure’ he still wants to play in 2021
Kyrie Irving looking forward to being back, Brooklyn Nets GM Sean Marks says
Mark Boucher – Emphasis on Australia Tests South Africa prepare to send ‘watered-down’ T20I team to Pakistan
Fantasy Premier League tips: Seven transfers to consider for Double Gameweek 19
Declan Rice urged to leave West Ham for Chelsea 'next season' to become 'top-class player'
Los Angeles Rams QB John Wolford ruled out; Jared Goff to start vs. Green Bay Packers
MLB hires former Chicago Cubs president Theo Epstein as consultant to ‘on-field matters’
Soccer4 days ago
Man Utd boss Ole Gunnar Solskjaer delivers Mason Greenwood verdict after Watford win
Soccer5 days ago
Man Utd attack involving Mason Greenwood and Amad Diallo 'would be a nightmare'
Cricket3 days ago
Aus vs Ind 3rd Test
MLB2 days ago
Carlos Carrasco says New York Mets are primed for postseason, World Series
NFL7 days ago
Houston Texans QB Deshaun Watson bothered by team’s hiring process, sources say
Soccer5 days ago
Man Utd boss Ole Gunnar Solskjaer urged by Rio Ferdinand to 'build around' leading star
Soccer4 days ago
Pep Guardiola makes Man City FA Cup vow but frustrated by latest Sergio Aguero absence
Soccer2 days ago
Tottenham chief Daniel Levy 'makes contact' with Real Madrid to satisfy Mourinho request