Connect with us


Women’s Hundred players given option for contract roll-over after postponement of 2020 season



Players offered a contract in the women’s Hundred for 2020 will be able to roll their deals over to 2021, the ECB has confirmed.

As ESPNcricinfo revealed back in June, women’s salary bands – which range from £3,600 to £15,000 – will be maintained for next year, while men’s deals have been cut by 20%, and will now be worth £24,000-£100,000.

Details over the men’s retention system are yet to be finalised, but the Professional Cricketers Associations (PCA) received a proposal from the ECB last week and has asked for feedback from representatives and members. A decision is expected to be reached soon, with the consultation process ongoing.

The Hundred’s initial regulations, pre-Covid, stated that each team would be able to retain up to 10 players at a mutually agreed salary band. All contracts for the competition were terminated in May, with players receiving 11.5% of their salary. That meant a combined £7 million loss for players, on top of the combined £3.8 million they gave up after agreeing to salary reductions, as well as giving up prize money, earlier this year due to the impact of the pandemic.

An ECB release said that the decision to allow women’s players to roll their contracts over had been reached in order to “offer maximum security to the players who were denied the opportunity to play in the Hundred this year”.

Contracted players will be able to re-sign with their existing teams this month, and teams will then have from October until May 2021 to replace any players who chose not to do so. Forty new professional contracts will also be awarded through the eight new regional centres in October, after 25 players signed retainers this summer.

Anya Shrubsole, who has taken up the option to re-sign for Southern Brave, said: “It’s good for all women’s players to have the security of rolling over their 2020 contract offers, should they want to do so. The summer we’ve had has obviously thrown up a bit of uncertainty and this helps confirm that everyone expecting to play in the Hundred will still get that opportunity.”

Beth Barrett-Wild, head of the women’s Hundred, said: “Covid-19 has caused some uncertainty for athletes, especially female athletes, so being able to provide immediate clarity and assurance to the women’s players that they will get the chance to re-sign for the same team and for the same fee in 2021 is very important, and demonstrates the Hundred’s ongoing commitment to the women’s game.”

Source link

Continue Reading


Women’s cricket – ‘We can’t let this crisis narrow our ambition’



Clare Connor, the ECB’s managing director of women’s cricket who is set to assume office in October 2021 as the first female president of the 233-year-old Marylebone Cricket Club, offered a ringside view into women’s cricket administration during an ICC “100% Cricket” virtual event. ESPNcricinfo highlights some key points made by the former England captain during the discussion that also featured India ODI captain Mithali Raj, cricketer-turned-broadcaster Ian Bishop, and moderator Lisa Sthalekar, the former Australia captain.

On changes in the women’s game she’s witnessed since entering cricket administration:

The shift’s been enormous [at the ECB]. I’ve been working for the ECB for a decade now. There were no women on the board [when I started out]. It wasn’t independent, and it was, therefore, by definition, self-interested. We now have 30% of our board members as female; I think we might be just over that now. We did have some ethnic diversity with Lord Kamlesh Patel but we need to be better in that space as do virtually all national governing body boards in this country.

Regardless of the actual diversity of the board, there’s a deeper understanding of the role that women’s cricket can play for the whole game in terms of relevance, sustainability, engaging families, and the fact that our sport is competing with so many other sports and lesser opportunities for families and children. It is understood and accepted that women’s cricket has been the biggest growth area and there’s still huge potential for growth. That evolving understanding of the role that women’s cricket can play and why it matters has been great to witness.

The ICC – there’s been a huge shift, but it’s been slower than what I have witnessed in my own country and committees and boards here. By virtue of being the chair of the ICC Women’s Committee, I sit on the chief executive’s committee as well, and I think there’s been a big shift there, probably led by James Sutherland before he left as the Cricket Australia chief executive officer.

A huge shift around the discussion of the women’s game, and a deeper understanding of and commitment to investing in it, the way the ICC board is comprised. There are 18 members on that board, 14 Full Members, three Associate Members and one female independent director. Therefore, the discussions of those chairs who are on the board – they’re all male and they are going to have the interests of their own organisations first and foremost. Therefore, getting independent, diverse debate and thinking and innovation around that table – whilst I can’t say from first-hand experience because I haven’t sat in there – is going to be difficult.

ALSO READ: Cricket for some, not for all. Where does the women’s game stand?

On potential innovations in the women’s game to make it more popular:

The most important thing is to have a really good rationale for making a change – to the playing conditions or formats. We knew why we created the multi-fomat Ashes: it was to protect that one-off Test. There was so little Test-match cricket being played in the women’s game but we wanted to protect it and create a narrative about the women’s Ashes, and that was well-received by the media and fans.

We’ve got to stop this comparison between women’s cricket not being as good as men’s cricket, because of you’re a six- or eight-year-old girl now and you’re getting into cricket really young, you know you’re on a pathway to playing women’s cricket. If that’s what she’s aiming for, she’s not making comparisons.

We’ll be seeing women’s cricket in the Commonwealth Games here in England for the first time [in Birmingham in 2022]. How do we use the opportunity to play in a multi-sport Games, with huge free-to-air coverage that we’ll gain, and how do we use that reach and platform to drive women’s and girls’ cricket in this country but also cricket more widely? With that opportunity to play in a multi-sport Games comes the obvious conversation: if men’s and women’s cricket is ever going to be in the Olympics, would that be a T20, would that be a shorter format even than the T20 because of the number of games you’d have to play? I can’t see a world where you’ve got men’s and women’s cricket in the Olympics with enough pitches and enough days to factor in all of the games you need, with T20, I think it’s still too long. So if the ambition is to be there, how does cricket get there?

“We’ve identified women’s cricket as a huge growth opportunity, so we can’t now let this crisis narrow our ambition and lens because all of that remains true”

Clare Connor

On contingency plans for England women’s summer after the Covid-19 pandemic took hold:

It’s been challenging. It hit us right at the start of the English summer or spring. But you keep some perspective on all of this: it is just cricket after all.

For the women’s game it’s been frustrating because we were due to host India and South Africa women in this summer and one by one they fell away. But we’ve been resolute; we knew the importance of that visibility – the Women’s T20 World Cup on March 8 and that amazing day which was broadcast around the world, with 1.1 billion digital views, showing what an amazing product and appetite there is for international women’s cricket. So we knew we had to get some international women’s cricket on this summer and we’re really thankful again to the West Indies women [for touring England].

On the road ahead for women’s cricket in the Covid-19-affected world:

Ultimately it comes down to decision-making about investments, both in our own Member boards and at the ICC level. I would be really worried if there weren’t right voices around the table having those debates about how we continue to carry on the momentum from March 8, and whatever comes over the next six months or two years, it’s going to be a challenge.

There’s huge uncertainty around schedules, and if the people around the table making decisions on investments and visibility of what’s going to be shown, if there isn’t that diversity to represent the women’s game across all of those discussions, then that’s concerning. We have to really look at it as an opportunity and think what kind of sport we want to be, how we can protect and drive this. You know, never let a crisis go waste.

We’ve identified women’s cricket as a huge growth opportunity, so we can’t now let this crisis narrow our ambition and lens because all of that remains true. That would be my one kind of plea, if you like, to those people sitting around those important decision-making tables: to remember that we have the sport here, it’s growing in interest, popularity, credibility, entertainment and commercial value. We shouldn’t forget that.

Source link

Continue Reading


BCCI chooses not to renew contracts of 11 National Cricket Academy coaches



The BCCI has decided not to renew the contracts of 11 National Cricket Academy (NCA) coaches, four of them former India players, in the wake of the Covid-19 crisis, because of which there has been no activity at the academy in Bengaluru for the past few months and no plans for a restart in the foreseeable future.

These coaches – former players Subroto Banerjee, Shiv Sunder Das, Hrishikesh Kanitkar, Ramesh Powar, Mansur Ali Khan and Sitanshu Kotak among them – were on one-year contracts for salaries ranging from INR 30 lakh to INR 50 lakh [$40,750 to $67,900 approx.]. They were informed by Rahul Dravid, the NCA boss, that they would not be needed after the deals end on September 30. The other members of the coaching staff to lose their jobs are Rajiv Dutta, Apurva Desai, Atul Gaikwad, Subhadeep Ghosh, and T Dilip.

As such, no clear reason for the decision has been conveyed to them, ESPNcricinfo learnt after speaking to some of the coaches who will be without jobs after a week.

“It came as a shock, because there was no warning, when Rahul called me and said he had some bad news for me,” one of the coaches told ESPNcricinfo on condition of anonymity. “There is no cricket (because of Covid-19), so they probably don’t want to continue with us. The people who were on long-term contracts are still there, but we have been told to go.”

“It is unfortunate, but the contracts have not been renewed,” a senior BCCI functionary told ESPNcricinfo. “The idea was to engage them for a whole year, and not on a piecemeal basis, when the NCA got them to work when they were free. So they worked with the national teams – India women, India Under-19, India A, Women’s Under-19s, Women’s A team – and for our national camps, across age groups, for women and men, which are conducted at NCA throughout the year.

“A lot of good work was going on, with these coaches and all the other people, in the educational wing, where (former India cricketer) Sujith Somasundar is in charge. I hope we consider re-employing them when work resumes at NCA again.”

While Dravid was unavailable for comment, one of the coaches we spoke to explained how closely the former India captain had worked with the coaching staff to “try and take Indian cricket to the next level”.

“Rahul had handpicked all of us (coaches), and it was done with a plan in place. We have made plans and programmes together, to try and take Indian cricket to the next level, become the best in the world for a long period,” one of the coaches said. “We have had meetings twice every week through the pandemic too. Work has been going on.

“Maybe we will be taken back later, but there are no guarantees.”

The coaches in question were hired around a year ago by the Supreme Court-appointed Committee of Administrators, who were in charge of helming the affairs of the BCCI till October last year, on Dravid’s recommendation, with an agreement to work 120 days during the course of the year.

Source link

Continue Reading


IPL 2020 RR vs CSK



Convinced that possessing an array of shots is a must to go with power-hitting, the Rajasthan Royals wicketkeeper-batsman Sanju Samson says he worked on these aspects during the coronavirus-enforced break.

The work done by Samson was there to be seen when he pulverised the Chennai Super Kings on Tuesday night, setting up a win with his blistering 32-ball 74, studded with nine sixes and a four.

That he is an impact player is a known fact but his clean and elegant hitting earned praise from one and all.

“I think range-hitting is what the game demands in this generation,” Samson said at the post-match presentation. “I had time to work out in these five months, and I think I’ve increased that ability.

“I’ve been working hard on my fitness, diet and training, and on my strength, because my game relies a lot on power-hitting.”

Samson, who was adjudged Man-of-the-Match, said his plan is to go and hit all the deliveries in his arc.

“My game plan is stand-and-deliver. If it’s in the arc, I go for it, and it’s very important to keep the intent to hit the ball if it’s there to be hit.”

With Robin Uthappa and Jos Buttler also in the squad, the Royals are spoilt for choice in the wicketkeeping department.

However, Samson, who executed two stumpings and as many catches against the Super Kings, said he is happy to play any role the captain and coach deem fit for him.

“Everyone likes to keep wickets and no one likes running around, but it’s up to the coach. We are happy to bring smiles on the fans’ faces and we hope to continue doing so.”

Source link

Continue Reading